Quantcast
Channel: VMware Communities : All Content - All Communities
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 180329

HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 650FLB - Gen9 networking inconsistency

$
0
0

I have come across an interesting issue with a new HPE platform. The system is running within a C7000 BladeSystem, with BL460c Gen9 blades.

 

We have noticed some degradation in performance on iSCSI connection (using the Software iSCSI initiator), this traffic runs over vmnic1 and vmnic2 details from the NIC list are below.

 

vmnic1  0000:06:00.1  elxnet  Up        Up       10000  Full32:a6:05:e0:00:be  1500  Emulex Corporation HPE FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 650FLB Adapter
vmnic2  0000:06:00.2  elxnet  Up        Up       10000  Full32:a6:05:e0:00:bd  1500  Emulex Corporation HPE FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 650FLB Adapter

 

Each NIC is reporting at 10000 Mb full, however I am not able to set the speed on the ESXi server. vmnic1 reports the following for advertised link modes;

 

[root@ESX:~] esxcli network nic get -n vmnic1

   Advertised Auto Negotiation: true

   Advertised Link Modes: 1000BaseKR2/Full, 10000BaseKR2/Full, 20000BaseKR2/Full, Auto

   Auto Negotiation: true

 

Where as vmnic2 reports the following modes

 

[root@ESXi2b-14:~] esxcli network nic get -n vmnic2

   Advertised Auto Negotiation: false

   Advertised Link Modes: 20000None/Full

   Auto Negotiation: false

 

Confused, the settings are identical for these within OneView. Both NIC's are using firmware - 12.0.1110.11 from SPP 2018.06.0. The HPE ESXi image has been used including driver version 12.0.1115.0 which shows as being compatible on the comparability guide VMware Compatibility Guide - I/O Device Search.

 

Has anyone else seen this issue? If I try and manually set the speed/duplex settings via esxcli it fails with the following error in the vmkernel.log

 

2018-08-14T23:49:41.361Z cpu20:65677)WARNING: elxnet: elxnet_linkStatusSet:7471: [vmnic2] Device is not privileged to do speed changes

 

As a result of this when using HCIBench to test the storage throughput the 95%tile_LAT value is reading excessively when traversing vmnic2 - 95%tile_LAT = 3111.7403 ms

 

Any thoughts??


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 180329

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>